Macro
Prudential Policy and Financial Stability
Macro
prudential regulation is the approach to financial regulation that aims to
mitigate risk to the financial system as a whole (or "systemic
risk"). In the aftermath of the late-2000s financial crisis, there is a
growing consensus among policymakers and economic researchers about the need to
re-orient the regulatory framework towards a macro prudential perspective.
Macro
Prudential Policy
·
More flexible and can be targeted and the spots of the financial
system that are creating distortions.
·
Instead of enhancing safety and soundness of individual
institutions, macro prudential policies focus on the welfare of the system.
·
Attempts to reduce the risk and the macroeconomic cost of
financial instability.
·
The conventional monetary policy is not well suited in handling
distortions in financial systems.
·
Address the inter-connectedness of individual FIs and market,
and their common exposure to economic risk factors.
Macro-prudential
Approach
·
Strengthen the analytical tools to use to gauge the built up of
systematic risk
·
Considerations of wide array of intermediaries and economic
sectors whose behavior potentially have systematic implications for financial
stability.
·
Relation between each financial institution and the real sector.
·
Interconnection between each financial institution and the
system as a whole.
·
Supervisory activity envisages the used of micro early warning
exercise
·
Cross fertilization between supervisory and macro prudential
analysis.
Tools to Macro
Prudential Policy
1. Use
counter-cyclical capital requirement, cap on loan-to-assets value ratios and
loan loss provision ratios, cap on debt-to-income ratio where potential bubbles
is forming.
2. To prevent
the accumulation of short-term debts
·
Liquidity coverage ration
·
Liquidity risk charges that penalized short term funding
·
Capital requirement surcharges proportional to size of maturity
mis-match
·
Minimum haircut requirement on assets backed security
3. Designing
procedure to deal with the failure of systematically important institutions and
prevent damage to the system.
4. Designing
intervention procedures to avoid large misalignment in real exchange rate.
5. Allow the
issuance of contingent certifies.
difference between macro prudential policy and micro prudential policy
Base
|
Macroprudential
|
Micro prudential
|
Proximate objective
|
Limit financial system-wide distress
|
Limit distress of individual institutions
|
Ultimate objective
|
Avoid output (GDP) costs
|
Consumer (investor/depositor) protection
|
Characterisation of risk
|
Seen as dependent on collective behavior
("endogenous")
|
Seen as independent of individual agents'
behavior ("exogenous")
|
Correlations and common exposures across institutions
|
Important
|
Irrelevant
|
Calibration of prudential controls
|
In terms of system-wide risk; top-down
|
In terms of risks of individual institutions;
bottom-up
|
Stability Objectives in Crisis
· Contain the
damage and limit the damage to the real economy
· Restore the
clam in the financial market
· Reduce
uncertainty and ensure proper functioning of market for short term credits
· Prevent the
collapse of FIs due to liquidity restriction
· Prevent the
collapse of the systematically important institutions even of they insolvent,
to save the financial system.
Ingredient For
Financial Stability
o Through
analysis
o Better or
robust regulation
o
International cooperation
1. Through
Analysis
· Consider
different source of systematic risk
· Wider data
coverage(both bank and non-bank FIs)
· More regular
and timely information
· Integration
of micro and macro information
· Use of
financial stability analysis model: early warning system and stress tests to
assess the resilience of the system
2. Robust
Regulation
· Counter
cyclic regulation
· Regulation
aimed at reducing pro-typicality of financial inter-mediation
· On capital
& liquidity specifically addressed by Basel iii
(liquidity
coverage (LCR), net stable funding ratio (NSFR)
3.
International Cooperation
· Ensure
effective exchange of information among supervisor in different jurisdictions.
· Use of
successful common actions to preserve financial integration but avoiding
negative cross boarder spillovers.
No comments:
Post a Comment